Middle Eastern Conflict

I was at a briefing recently on Parliament Hill about the situation in Northern Iraq. I can’t tell you about it.

One of the reasons I attended was to get an update on what is happening in the region. I was there twice last year and do feel I have a bit of connection to the area and its people. However, shortly after she started speaking, the presenter said “this is of course all off the record.” As a one-time journalist I respect that.

The funny thing is, I didn’t really learn anything new so being off the record doesn’t really matter. The situation has not changed appreciably since I was there last in November. There were horror stories of ISIS atrocities, but sadly those too are nothing new. Maybe it was just natural caution. By making the briefing off the record the speaker, from an American NGO, felt she could speak more freely.wpid-img_20151115_104555.jpg

The unanswered question remains: How should the world deal with ISIS? In Canada that was a matter of some debate during last year’s election campaign. Voters were presented with three distinct viewpoints.

One party wanted to provide air support for Iraqi and Syrian troops battling ISIS, plus a small number of trainers to help the Kurdish Peshmerga. A second party felt we should keep our jets at home and increase military training and humanitarian aid. And a third suggested we just not get involved, that it really isn’t our battle.

You can make a strong case for all three positions – and pretty much whichever one you choose is going to be the wrong one. That has less to do with the intelligence of politicians and their advisors than the nature of the conflict. It’s a complex war. There are no simple solutions.wpid-img_20151115_104610.jpg

Actually, that’s not quite true. There are simple solutions. The problem is they just will make things worse in the long run. It’s a complicated part of the world, centuries and millennia of clashing cultures and conflicts. It seems to me that every time outsiders get involved things get worse.

So how do we who don’t live in the area respond? Can we ignore the humanitarian crisis brought on by military conflict?  Should we leave the region to solve its own problems?

I have very definite opinions – but I won’t detail them here. That’s because those opinions keep changing and what I think about the situation today will probably be different tomorrow. I am though rather interested what you think needs to be done. Any thoughts?



  1. How is ISIS staying alive? Apply sanctions against anyone supporting them. Trump had a point when he challenged Saudi Arabia to fight ISIS. Saudi Arabia is rich enough, isn’t it?

    The democracy experiment is over. The people don’t want it / don’t have the philosophical background for it. One book, Islam Exceptionalism appears to argue that (per an interview I saw). The West doesn’t care…except for oil and terrorism. So, strongmen in power are acceptable to the people and to the West.

  2. Btad Darbyson · · Reply

    Anti-ISIS coalition has mobilized up to 62 nations and groups. Anything less than the united front of a global coalition assembled to fight ISIS gives it greater negotiating power to secure WMD’s from a rogue state. Stephen Harper believed this and had Canada on the right track with its coalition allies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: