Now There Are Six…

We are in the home stretch, more or less. The contest to see who will be the next leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (and potentially Canada’s next Prime Minister) has been narrowed to six candidates.

I think there were about a dozen this time last week, as candidates scrambled to meet the deadline to gain the signatures of party members and raise the $300,000 entry fee. Several of those who assured the media they would make the cut didn’t.

The first leadership debate is tonight, a private event, and ballots will be counted September 10. The first public debate is May 11.

It is going to be an interesting race. The problem for all candidates will be to strike a balance. All are conservative in their outlook, some more so than others.

Several pf those who don’t make the cut are crying foul, saying they met the requirements but still weren’t accepted as candidates. This has happened in previous races.

So called social conservatives make up a significant percentage of the party membership, but there is a perception the country doesn’t want a socially conservative Prime Minister. The theory is a more centrist leader is required, and the party powers-that-be are not thrilled at having too many social conservatives on the ballot. They don’t want candidates,or the media focusing on policies that are not considered mainstream.

At least three of those who failed to make the cut this time around are social conservatives, and their supporters are upset. They feel there should be a variety of social conservatives on the ballot in the hopes one will win.

One of the people I had hoped to see on the final ballot was Leona Alleslev, who probably wouldn’t be classified as a social conservative. She declared her candidacy late and couldn’t raise enough money in the short time period to meet the deadline. To me that is a shame – she would have had a broad appeal, and, from what I know of her, would be a much better Prime Minister than the incumbent. 

The focus for the candidates now is on selling party memberships, as only party members can vote. The cut-off date for that is June 3.

Political leadership campaigns say a lot about who we are as a country. Or at least about the political party in question. 

Which is a higher consideration, policy or pragmatism? Is it more important for a candidate to be electable, or to espouse the basic tenets of the party? How much compromose is a good thing? Or is any compromise bad?

All of the six Conservative candidates think they are electable, think they will become Prime Minister. They wouldn’t be running otherwise. 

It will be interesting to see what the voters think, in September when the leader is chosen and whenever the next federal election is held. 

One comment

  1. The Conservatives have to make a collective decision to protect freedom of religion or not. Andrew Scheer won the popular vote (but too concentrated in some ridings) but the problem with him was social conservatism and an unwillingness to defend it. Erin O’Toole was the antidote to that, but flip-flopped enough that his caucus was tired of him. Any leader will have to address social conservatism….and defend it. Maybe by putting ‘family first’ that may be an argument in a secular world…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: